top of page

NEWS
Get the inside story.
Search


Previously invalid iPhone will valid in dispute over $10m estate
A will made on an iPhone has been declared valid in a recent appeal. In Wheatley v Peek [2025] NSWCA 265, the court confirmed that the iPhone note should in fact be treated as the deceased’s will and the original decision in Peek v Wheatley [2025] NSWSC 554 be reversed. Matthew Burgess, director of View Legal, said this decision re-confirms that courts can recognise informal statements as valid testamentary documents if it can be proven that the deceased intended the relevant


PBR takes hard line on death benefit dependant criteria
Despite being reliant on their parent(s) through a chronic illness and subsequent disability that prevented them from working, a beneficiary has been determined not to be a death benefits dependant. In a recent private binding ruling (1052395100997) the commissioner found the beneficiary applicant was not in an interdependent relationship nor qualified as a death benefit dependent because they did not have a close personal relationship nor commitment to a shared life prior to


Subsidised student not enough to qualify as death benefit dependant: PBR
A student receiving Youth Allowance and payments from a parent does not qualify as being a financial dependent in regard to superannuation death benefit. In a recent Private Binding Ruling (1052451473448), the commissioner said despite being subsidised by parent before their death, the beneficiary is not a death benefits dependant of the deceased in accordance with section 302-195 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997). The facts of the ruling state the beneficiary
A wealth of knowledge at your fingertips.
Easy finance tips. Join our email list.
bottom of page